
72
3 MONITORING AND CONTROL
3
To arrive at this conclusion, obviously we need to compare more than one reading.
With a pH sensor, it is recommended to place sensors in solutions which are neutral
(pH 7) and either one which is acidic (say, 4.0) or one that is alkaline (say, 10.0).
The use of the two values will enable the relationship between the sensor and the
standard to be established.
Multipoint calibration
Figure 3.2 shows a graph of a sensor’s readings plotted
against a standardised (pre-calibrated) sensor, but this
time for a range of temperatures. The temperature
readings are taken from a hot liquid as it cools down.
Although the sensor being calibrated in Figure 3.2 has
the same reading as the standardised sensor at the lower
end, it is markedly different for other readings. The
calibration cannot be carried out by just adding an offset
value or by allowing for the slope. There is no longer a
linear relationship between the two and to calibrate the
sensor, the algorithm would need to include some form
of what is called ‘curve fitting’. This is because it is a
nonlinear relationship and needs to be described using a
quadratic function of the form y = ax
2
+ bx + c, where y
is the standardised reading and x is the reading from the
sensor that needs calibration. Do not worry if you find this complicated as all you
really need to understand is that the values from the sensor are a curve, whereas they
should be a straight line and the algorithm needs to be amended to deal with this.
To carry out the calibration, at least three known temperatures need to be created
and the sensor readings at those temperatures need to be taken. Good practice
would be to use temperatures of 100ºC, 0ºC and say, 50ºC. This should provide
the relationship between the sensor and the standardised sensor.
Advantages and disadvantages of monitoring technologies
Although computers are now used in all aspects of monitoring, there is still the
need for humans to be involved. Here is a table showing the advantages and
disadvantages of computer monitoring compared with people taking readings.
Advantages of computer monitoring Disadvantages of computer monitoring
Humans are unable to take readings at very frequent intervals as
they need to make a note of each reading. This takes time, during
which they cannot take another reading. Computers are able to
take readings at more frequent intervals and are capable of reading
more than one variable simultaneously. Humans can only do one
thing at a time, so take longer.
It is very difficult for humans to keep taking readings for sustained
periods, whereas computers can be left on to take readings at
any time, day or night. The readings are always taken at regular
intervals unlike with a human who might forget to take them.
Computers can be expensive to buy, whereas humans
would be expected to do the monitoring as part of
their job. Computers are also expensive to maintain.
It takes time for people to draw accurate graphs, whereas
computers can produce them automatically after processing the
data.
It is quite difficult to program computers to interpret
the results, but humans can interpret results and are
also needed to program the computers in the first place.
Results are produced automatically after the readings are
received by the microprocessor or computer, unlike a human
who would take a lot of time to write them down.
Readings taken by computers tend to be more accurate than those
by humans as computers are not subject to ‘human error’.
Sensors can deteriorate after a period of time,
whereas humans will tend to be more consistent.
V Table 3.2 Advantages and disadvantages of monitoring technologies
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sensor
Key
Standard
0
V Figure 3.2 Multipoint calibration